Friday, 26 February 2016 08:47

CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE: BILL C-24

Written by 
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Constitutional Challenge: Bill C-24, Launched By Civil Rights Groups

 

TORONTO: A new law that gives federal government the power to revoke Canadian citizenship for certain dual nationals undermines the country's identity and violates its Constitution, a coalition of civil rights groups said Thursday.

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL) said the rules that went into effect when Bill C-24 became law in May create a two-tiered system in which naturalized Canadians are treated as second-class.

The two organizations are launching a formal constitutional challenge of the law on the grounds that it violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The organizations take exception to the government's much-publicized position that the bill is necessary to protect Canada from terrorism, but have focused the charter challenge on many of the law's lesser-known clauses.

Vague stipulations about a new Canadian's intention to live here, plus changes to the procedure by which people can contest challenges to their citizenship, mean the bill could have an impact on millions more than Ottawa's intended target, they said.

"All Canadian citizens used to have the same citizenship rights no matter what their origin," B.C. Civil Liberties Association Executive Director Josh Paterson said at a news conference.

"We were all equal under the law. Now this new law has divided us into classes of citizens: those with more rights and those - overwhelmingly immigrants to Canada and their children and grandchildren - who have fewer rights."

In rolling out the contentious bill, the federal government spoke openly about some of the new powers it would provide.

The new law allows Ottawa to revoke citizenship for anyone convicted of terrorism, treason or espionage offences inside or outside of Canada. The rules also apply to dual citizens who take up arms against Canada by fighting in a foreign army or joining an international terrorist organization.

Immigration Minister Chris Alexander has previously stated that the regulations are necessary to combat "the ever-evolving threat of Jihadist terrorism."

But the civil rights groups said other provisions, such as the "intent to reside clause," present more insidious threats.

CARL member Lorne Waldman said the ambiguously worded clause forces naturalized citizens to declare their intention to make Canada their permanent home, but leaves the door open to accuse them of misrepresenting their claims if they're out of the country for an extended period of time.

"This means that if after they obtain citizenship they wish to travel abroad for an extended period, perhaps if they got accepted into a university or because there's a family member who's ill, they face the prospect of having their citizenship revoked because they misrepresented their intention," he said.

Waldman also expressed concern over the revamped revocation process.

He said people on the verge of losing citizenship previously had the right to a hearing in front of a judge, who would then decide their fate.

Now, Waldman said, people are given 60 days to fight the revocation through a written submission, and the final decisions are made by government employees.

He also criticized Ottawa's stated purpose for Bill C-24, saying many terrorism convictions handed down outside of Canada are reached through dubious processes.

Waldman cited the example of Mohamed Fahmy, the Canadian-born journalist convicted of terrorist offences in Egypt during a trial that was internationally condemned as politically motivated and unjust.

Fahmy's case was so infamous that the official opposition New Democrats extracted a promise from the government that the new rules would not be used to target him when the law was first announced.

A spokesman for the federal government said it would "aggressively defend itself in court" and said the bill enjoys popular support.

This is not the first time Bill C-24 has been taken before the courts.

Hence, Toronto-based lawyers Paul Slansky and Rocco Galati launched a constitutional court challenge against the new law. Federal Court Judge Donald Rennie dismissed the case earlier this year.

 

 

 

Read 465280 times Last modified on Friday, 26 February 2016 08:51

18368 comments

  • Comment Link Lowell Sunday, 19 November 2017 11:48 posted by Lowell

    I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you create this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it
    for you? Plz reply as I'm looking to create my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from.
    thanks

  • Comment Link Beverly Sunday, 19 November 2017 11:48 posted by Beverly

    Hello, all the time i used to check webpage posts here in the
    early hours in the dawn, as i enjoy to gain knowledge of more and more.

  • Comment Link Thao Sunday, 19 November 2017 11:31 posted by Thao

    This design is spectacular! You evidently know how to keep a reader entertained.
    Between your humor and your videos, I was almost moved to start my very own blog.
    Great job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and
    in addition to that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  • Comment Link Christi Sunday, 19 November 2017 10:35 posted by Christi

    Beneficial information shared. I'm delighted to read this article.
    thanks for giving us nice info. enjoy this post.

  • Comment Link fathers day t shirt star wars Sunday, 19 November 2017 10:19 posted by fathers day t shirt star wars

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read? Miss feather hair extensions

  • Comment Link Christian Sunday, 19 November 2017 10:05 posted by Christian

    I truly love your website.. Very nice colors & theme.
    Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I'm hoping to create my own personal
    website and would love to learn where you got this from or exactly what the theme is named.
    Thanks!

  • Comment Link Christmas Shirts Sunday, 19 November 2017 09:48 posted by Christmas Shirts

    Truⅼy noo matter if someone doesn't be aware of then its up to other users that they will help, so here it takeѕ place. http://ruyitea.com/comment/html/?322315.html

  • Comment Link Umanizzare Gestão Prisional Ltda Sunday, 19 November 2017 09:36 posted by Umanizzare Gestão Prisional Ltda

    What's Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively helpful and it has helped me out loads. I'm hoping to contribute & help different users like its aided me. Good job.|

  • Comment Link Kristi Sunday, 19 November 2017 09:21 posted by Kristi

    The vehicle will be parked at the Island aesthetic.

  • Comment Link Jolie Sunday, 19 November 2017 08:22 posted by Jolie

    discreet packaging as well as fast delivery.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.